sábado, 25 de abril de 2015

Self-Management of Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Vinicius C Oliveira*
Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Low back pain (LBP) is the number one cause of years lived with disability globally [1]. The specific pathoanatomical causes are unclear for 85% of all cases of LBP and these cases are classified as non-specific [2]. The most consistently recommended treatments for non-specific LBP in clinical guidelines (e.g., supervised exercise therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy) [3] have at best moderate effects on patients’ clinical outcomes (85% of treatments had point estimates of ≤ 20 points on 100-point scale) [4]. A major problem for currently recommended treatments is that people with incomplete recovery of LBP or with recurrent episodes often seek further treatment [5], initiating a process of dependence on health care services, and increasing the economic burden of the condition [6]. A potential solution for the process of dependence on health care services is to shift from traditional models of care where the patient is a passive recipient of treatment, to models where patients are actively involved in the management of their LBP [7]. Self-management has been described as a model of care where patients use strategies to manage and monitor their own health, retaining a primary role in management, and where they learn skills to be used in the daily management of their health condition [7]. Written information, discussion sessions and audiovisual resources (audiotape, videotape and web site) have been used as self-management strategies for LBP, and the amount of support given by health care providers varies from one to thirteen sessions [8]. Furthermore, self-management has been advocated for LBP [7,9]. There is a growing awareness that LBP is a long term condition and self-management could decrease dependence and the burden of this condition [7,9].
Self-management of LBP has been recommended to avoid dependence on health care services and to decrease the costs of this condition; however, the estimated effect size of self-management of LBP found in a recent systematic review was only small (<5 points on 100-point scale for pain and disability), unlikely to be clinically important [8]. This suggested that the recommendations of selfmanagement in guidelines for management of LBP [9] are probably too optimistic. To potentially reduce global costs of LBP, self-management needs to be optimised. A major challenge for clinicians and researchers is how to optimise the self-management of LBP.
Self-management has been described as a model of care whereby patients retain a primary role in management [7]. However, the current self-management programs do not appear to include the patient in the decision-making process appropriately and actively [8]. For instance, pre-designed educational material does not include patients’ opinion and preferences in the decision-making process [8]. A further problem is the lack of agreement concerning the amount of intervention by a health care provider that is consistent with self-management. Currently, the format for provision of self-management programs varies from one to thirteen single or group sessions with or without support of health care providers and with short- or long-term follow-ups [8]. To optimise self-management programs, further research should attempt to reach consensus among clinicians and researchers on the definition of self-management and also on the content of programs. For instance, consensus should be found for whether the intervention involves no interaction with a health care provider or could involve advice and education about an exercise program.
Another potential way to optimise self-management of LBP is screening specific features of patients’ prognosis from the health domains of pain, activity limitation and psychosocial factors using, for instance, tools such as the STarT [10] and subgrouping patients into risk of poor prognosis to assist decisions about appropriate treatment (i.e., self-management strategies or other supervised therapies). Subgroup of patients with low risk of poor prognosis treated with self-management may have greater improvements on clinical outcomes than subgroup of patients with high risk of poor prognosis [10].
References









Falls and Hip Fractures Prevention
Keizo Sakamoto* and Takashi Nagai
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Japan

Various measures for preventing falls have been reported. The systematic review and meta-analysis on effective exercise methods aimed at fall prevention conducted by Scherrington et al. [1] provided the valuable findings that balance training involving standing with both feet closer together or on one leg, without any walking, is effective for fall prevention, and that ≥ 50 hours of overall training time is required. The most important factor in fall prevention measures is the continuation of exercise (training). Moreover, the exercise method must be such that the exercise can be continued easily and inexpensively by anyone without the need for various types of equipment. The dynamic flamingo exercise [2], which involves performing single-leg standing with the eyes open for one minute three times daily, exerts a load on the femur that is approximately three times greater than standing on both legs. This exercise is a fall prevention exercise method aimed at improving bone mineral density in the proximal femur as well as balance ability involving the muscles around the pelvis. It is not possible to prevent falls without putting in effort. We believe that continuation of efficient exercise training on a daily basis will contribute greatly to fall prevention, and ultimately lead to fracture prevention.
Bones fracture when a load of a certain amount is applied on the bone. We firmly believe that promoting bone quality in the proximal femur, and additionally balance ability, will lead to reductions in the number of cases of proximal femoral fractures.
References

Researching the Effectiveness of Therapeutic Interventions for Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis


The carpometacarpal (CMC) joint of the thumb plays a vital role in optimal hand function. The thumb CMC joint is frequently affected by osteoarthritis (OA), a degenerative condition that can result in deterioration of the joint surfaces [1,2]. Individuals with CMC joint OA have decreased grip strength that impacts hand function and their ability to perform resistive grip tasks and seemingly simple tasks such as wringing out washcloths and performing meal preparation tasks [3,4]. The purpose of this short communication is to enhance the readers understanding the clinical reasoning that is required of therapists that prescribe exercises to individuals with CMC OA of and to illustrate the need for further research in this area.
A systematic review looking at the efficacy of conservative interventions for CMC OA was published and found that conservative interventions such as orthotic provision, hand exercises, application of heat, joint protection education, and the provision of adaptive equipment improve grip strength and function [5].
The efficacy of exercise was established in the systematic review but it was found that there was much disparity between the exercise interventions for the CMC joint that were analyzed in the review. A comprehensive literature review was performed and data was gathered from bench studies that looked at the biomechanical forces that act on the CMC joint. The findings from the bench studies characterized the causes of instability at the basal thumb joint resulting from ligament instability and contact forces. This information led to the publication of an article that proposed an exercise program based on the findings of the bench studies [6].
More recent collaborative work with Jorge Villafañe has gathered data on grip and pinch strength, the validity of the measuring instruments used to assess pinch and grip, and thumb and finger abduction strength in a population of 70 to 90 year old females with CMC OA and normal controls [7]. Another study aimed to establish the cutoff values scores for minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of grip, tripod pinch, and tip pinch for patients that have CMC OA. The concept of the MCID refers to the smallest difference in a score that is considered to be worthwhile or important [8]. Women with CMC OA demonstrated 10 Kg mean lower grip strength (6.2 Kg) when compared to healthy controls (16.8 Kg) (p<0.01). The MCID from baseline score in this patient population was 0.84 Kg for grip, 0.33 Kg for tip and 0.35 Kg for tripod pinch for the affected right hand. It was also found that maximum handgrip strength and pinch strength can be measured reliably, using the Jamar hand dynamometer and pinch meter, in patients with thumb CMC OA, which enables its use in research and in the clinic to determine the effect on interventions on improving grip.
The CMC joint and the effectiveness of the interventions that therapists provide to improve and restore hand strength and function provide a fascinating research topic. Further research studies may positively affect the outcomes and interventions that therapists provide to their patients with CMC OA.
References







Kristin Valdes*
Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions, Provo, Utah, USA

Tai Chi Inspired Exercise Early Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report


jessica W Smith1, Mark Cipriani Jr2, Robin L Marcus3 and Paul LaStayo1,3*
1Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
2School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
3Department of Physical Therapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Keywords Osteoarthritis; Tai Chi; Muscle function 
Background Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical intervention for older individuals with advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA). TKA has been repeatedly shown to reduce the chronic knee pain associated with OA and improve physical functioning. [1-4]. Regardless, studies have also shown that individuals with OA who undergo TKA continue to have reduced quadriceps strength compared to age-matched counterparts with native knees [1,4,5]. Persistent quadriceps weakness is clinically important due to its relation to physical function and mobility, as well as force output variability [6]. Indeed, muscle atrophy, muscle weakness, and neuromuscular activation deficits are all factors that have been implicated in residual post-operative strength impairments [7,8]. Our team has previously developed a resistance exercise program that utilizes specialized equipment and licensed clinical staff to produce eccentric contractions and negative work that improves muscle and physical function. Eccentric exercise is typically considered higher intensity therapy, however, no adverse knee joint responses have been reported following knee surgery [9-12]. Furthermore, the low metabolic cost required to produce the eccentrically-induced negative work results in a compliance rate that is greatly enhanced, making it ideally suited to an older, adult population [9]. These same eccentricnegative work principles can be utilized during rehabilitation with Tai Chi inspired Movements that are Eccentrically-biased (MOVE), thus eliminating the need for specialized equipment and specialized staff. The benefits of Tai Chi are supported by a study by Lu et al. [13], that showed that implementation of a Tai Chi training program in elderly adults for 16 weeks can significantly improve both arterial compliance and eccentric knee extensor strength [13]. Additionally, preliminary work in our clinic suggests that the TKA rehabilitation benefits of eccentric exercise may be experienced without costly equipment by utilizing the simple, low-cost MOVE program. The MOVE rehabilitation suite of exercises is founded on the principle that an external load (e.g., a weight or mass) must exceed the force being produced by the muscle, thereby inducing an eccentric lengthening of the muscle. The external load in MOVE consists of an individual’s body mass. During these exercises (Tai Chi inspired movements plus functional weight-bearing exercises), the eccentric loading consists of the individual’s body mass and the movement patterns are designed to progressively transfer more of an individual’s body mass over a single leg in an eccentric fashion. The potential benefits of this program include improved proprioception and ability to control submaximal muscle forces, the latter of which has been shown to be an independent risk factor of age-related impairment of physical performance [6,14,15]. More specifically, quadriceps muscle force steadiness (MFS), which assesses the ability to maintain constant submaximal muscle forces, has been positively correlated with physical performance in patients with hip OA [16], and with functional performance in elderly women [6], elderly fallers compared to non-fallers [15], and in individuals with knee OA compared to healthy controls [17]. To understand the potential of MFS as a rehabilitation target, it is important to understand the mechanisms that influence muscle deficits post-operatively and hence, physical function. In particular, the first few months following surgery are associated with decreases in physical function when compared with pre-operative levels, and quadriceps’ strength is linked to levels of mobility and physical function [1-3,7,8]. Furthermore, in individuals with OA who undergo TKA, the greatest losses in quadriceps’ strength occur in the immediate post-operative period [1-3,7,8,18]. Therefore, this period should be a primary target of rehabilitation, as preventing functional loss in the short-term is more likely to be effective than working to reverse losses months or years after surgery. Thus, the purpose of this case report is twofold. First, to describe the early post-operative changes in muscle and physical function associated with a Tai Chi inspired rehabilitation program, and second, to describe the effect of TKA surgery and rehabilitation on quadriceps MFS. We hypothesized that subjects participating in early Tai Chi inspired MOVE rehabilitation would safely and feasibly improve muscle function and that MFS would improve from pre- to post-surgery, both of which would carry over to physical function improvements. This case report discusses the results of one subject who underwent TKA surgery and participated in the MOVE rehabilitation program. 

Case Description This case report describes a female subject with bilateral OA who underwent unilateral TKA surgery in her most symptomatic (painful) knee. Prior to surgery, the subject was enrolled in a clinical study (Study 1) that included evaluation of quadriceps MFS in both legs at two time points; 1 week prior to surgery (T1) and at 6 months post-operatively (T4). The purpose of Study 1 was to assess muscle and physical function outcomes pre- and post-surgery, including stair climbing tasks, gait function, and quadriceps MFS. The subject was subsequently enrolled in the MOVE study (Study 2) at two weeks post-operatively, after she had been discharged to home. The subject was enrolled in the MOVE Study 2 to evaluate the effects of this training regimen on similar muscle and physical function parameters, which were measured before MOVE was initiated (i.e., at 4 wks post-operatively [T2]) and after MOVE (i.e., at 10 wks post-operatively [T3]). For both studies, the subject was recruited from the joint arthroplasty surgical group at the University of Utah Orthopedic Center (Salt Lake City, UT). Upon enrollment prior to surgery, the subject was 62 years of age, 172 cm tall, and 96.8 kg (BMI 32.8 kg/m2). She did not have neurological conditions affecting mobility, but had ongoing medications that included hydrochlorothiazide, ezitimibe/simvastatin, and levothyroxine. The diagnosis of OA was confirmed pre-operatively with radiographs and careful review of past medical conditions. Additional examination of the subject’s extremities was performed to rule out signs/deformities of rheumatologic disease. 

Movements that are Eccentrically-Biased (MOVE) The Tai Chi inspired, MOVE rehabilitation program was initiated on post-operative day 28 and continued for 12 sessions (two times per week for six weeks) with the final session on post-operative day 63. The subject performed a maximum of five separate Tai Chi exercises during each session, without specialized equipment, under the guidance of a non-licensed staff member who was supervised by a licensed physical therapist. These varying Tai Chi inspired movement patterns focused on strengthening the quadriceps, calves and hamstrings, as well as to a lesser degree the gluteals and abdominal musculature. The Tai Chi inspired MOVE exercises were progressed by adding one Tai Chi movement per week until all eight movements were learned (See Table 1A Appendix A for a description of the eight Tai Chi inspired exercises). However, a maximum of five Tai Chi inspired movements were used during each session, alternating exercises for variety. Up to 40 minutes per session were dedicated to the Tai Chi inspired movements. The number of repetitions, sets, and duration of movements were progressively altered based on the subject’s ability. The Tai Chi inspired movements were supplemented with functional exercises, which were performed for 20 minutes or less during each session and included sit-to-stand, hip abduction, heel raises, and stair ascent and descent. MOVE exercises were performed for the remainder of each session (Table 1B Appendix A). In addition to monitoring any pain responses (Figure 1), the subject’s ability and performance were used to evaluate the decision to progress, halt, or even regress the MOVE program. Criteria to stop advancing and reduce the workload included, but were not limited to: an inability to perform the movement, safety concerns due to imbalance or weakness, or if the movement acted as a stimulus for additional joint pain. In such cases, the movement was stopped and attempted at a later session. The program was not progressed in situations where the subject was unable to perform the movement correctly or could not complete the desired number of repetitions or sets due to fatigue. Advancing the program using more challenging movements occurred as the subject mastered the previous movement and completed the desired repetitions with ease. Safety and feasibility were assessed by measuring pain levels (0- 10), circumferential knee measures of swelling (cm), and knee range of motion (degrees) at each training session, along with compliance with the MOVE program. As the subject progressed, the knee and hip flexion range of motion during the movement patterns increased and/or the speed in which the movements were performed was slowed. The goal of each exercise session was to dedicate 75% to the Tai Chi inspired MOVE and 25% to more functional, lower extremity exercises. Outcome measurements over all time points included muscle function, physical function, and self-report outcome measures, as follows: • Muscle function testing included maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) measured on a KinCom 500H dynamometer (Isokinetic International, Chattex Corporation, Harrison, TN), lower extremity power measured on the Nottingham Power Rig (Nottingham, UK), and the coefficient of variation (CV) of quadriceps MFS; • Physical function was assessed using the 6-minute walk test, timed up-and-go test, stair climbing test, and gait speed; and • Self-report outcome measures included the 1-week and 4-week recall of the SF-36 Total Health Status Survey (SF-36) and the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS).

 Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction and Power The subject’s maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) was assessed on the KinCom dynamometer (Harrison, TN) pre-operatively (T1) and at 6 months post-operatively (T4). Strength was measured at 90 degrees of hip flexion and 45 degrees of knee flexion, which corresponded to the midpoint of the range of quadriceps MFS testing. Prior to the recorded tests, the subject performed three sub-maximal practice trials to become familiar with the testing procedure. The actual test involved three trials. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the peak force for the three trials had to be ≤ 8% for the test to be considered acceptable. The subject met the acceptance criteria on the first set of three trials for both the surgical and non-surgical legs at all-time points and therefore, additional trials were not required. Power was assessed using the Nottingham power rig before and after MOVE rehabilitation at study visits T2 and T3. The subject performed one warm-up effort each at 50%, 75%, and 100% effort followed by 6 efforts of maximal exertion, with the average of the 6 maximal efforts recorded. 

Quadriceps Muscle Force Steadiness (MFS) One week prior to TKA surgery (T1) and at 6 months postoperatively (T4), the subject was assessed for quadriceps MFS on a KinCom dynamometer. To establish the target force for MFS testing, the subject’s quadriceps MVIC was measured bilaterally as described above. The peak force from the three MVIC tests on each leg was used to calculate the target force for MFS testing, which was 50% of MVIC. Quadriceps MFS was assessed concentrically and eccentrically, in both legs, by assessing the subject’s ability to maintain a constant force over two seconds. Concentric MFS was tested from 75 to 15 degrees of knee flexion and eccentric MFS was tested from 15 to 75 degrees of knee flexion. MFS testing was performed isokinetically at a fixed speed of 15 degrees/second, and data were sampled at 1000 Hz. Thus, a total of 4 seconds of data were collected for each of the concentric and eccentric contractions, with the middle two seconds, corresponding to knee flexion between 30 and 60 degrees, used for data analysis. For MFS testing, the computer monitor was placed approximately three feet in front of the subject and the main lights in the room were dimmed to enhance the contrast on the screen. A target force line representing 50% of the subject’s MVIC was visible on the screen. During testing, the subject was instructed to apply resistance against the lever arm attached to their lower leg and produce enough force to reach and maintain the target force line on the computer monitor, as steadily as possible, over the entire range of motion (i.e., 75 deg to 15 deg of knee flexion). The same procedure was used for the eccentric MFS testing, with the exception that the force produced occurred during quadriceps muscle lengthening (i.e., 15 deg to 75 deg of knee flexion). The MFS testing included one non-recorded practice trial each, for concentric and eccentric contractions, to become familiar with the testing procedure, followed by 24 recorded trials. Following data collection, the CV of both the concentric and eccentric force-time curves of the MFS data were calculated for all trials. Data analysis included the middle two seconds (60 deg to 30 deg of knee flexion) of data, filtered at 100 Hz, and de-trended to remove any slope to the data. The slope was not relevant to the CV, as we were interested in the degree of fluctuation about a straight line. The data were then normalized by subtracting the average force attained from the force target (i.e., 50% MVIC). The CV of MFS was then calculated as the ratio of the standard deviation, σ, to the absolute value of the mean, μ, of the de-trended data as follows:                  CV = σ/abs (μ)               (1) The CV for both the concentric and eccentric contractions for all recorded tests was used for data analysis. 

SCT and Gait Speed The stair climbing test and gait speed were assessed at all four time points. The stair climbing test consisted of three trials each of stair ascent and stair descent on a set of 10 stairs. Self-selected, “normal” gait speed was also assessed using the GAITRite system (CIR Systems, Inc., Sparta, NJ). The GAITRite system automates measuring temporal and spatial gait parameters via an electronic walkway. For each time point, gait speed was averaged over 6 trials, each of which consisted of approximately 6 total footfalls per trial.

 6-Minute Walk and Timed Up-and-Go The 6-minute walk test measured the distance the subject was able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The timed upand- go test was performed by measuring the time it took the subject to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. 

SF-36 and Lower Extremity Functional Scale Additional outcome measures included the self-report SF-36 health outcomes survey, which is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey of functional health and well-being, and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) which is a questionnaire regarding physical activity level specifically related to the lower extremity. The 4-week recall version of the SF-36 survey was used at the pre-operative (T1) and 6 months postoperative (T4) visits, and the 1-week recall version of the SF-36 was used before (T2) and after (T3) the MOVE rehabilitation program. The 4-week recall was appropriate for the pre- and 6 months post-operative assessments due to the relatively long-duration between measurements. However, the 1-week recall was used for the pre- and post-MOVE assessments due to its sensitivity to recent, acute changes in health status [19]. Table 1 includes a summary and schedule of tests performed at each of the 4 time points; one week prior to surgery (T1), and 4 wks (T2), 10 wks (T3), and 6 months post-operatively (T4). 

Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics including mean and standard deviation were calculated for all parameters except quadriceps MFS. For MFS, a t-test, assuming unequal variances, was performed using SPSS Statistical Software (IBM Corporation; Armonk, NY) for comparisons between study visits, contraction type, and for surgical vs. non-surgical leg. 

Outcomes The subject attended one pre-operative visit, 1 wk prior to surgery (T1); one study visit prior to initiation of the MOVE program (T2); 12 out of 12 rehabilitation sessions from 4 weeks to 10 weeks postoperatively; one study visit following the MOVE program (T3); and one 6 months post-operative visit (T4). From 4 weeks to 10 weeks postoperatively, the subject’s pain decreased from a score of 3 to 0 on a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale, and swelling decreased from 43.0 cm to 42.5 cm. Knee range of motion also improved from 10 to 110 degrees at T2 to 1 to 114 degrees at T3. The subject’s BMI remained the same at 32.8 kg/m2 from the pre-operative study visit (T1) to the 6 months post-operative study visit (T4). 

Muscle Function The subject’s MVIC was assessed on the KinCom dynamometer pre-operatively (T1) and at 6 months post-operatively (T4). Strength was measured at 45 degrees of knee flexion, which corresponded to the midpoint of the range of quadriceps MFS testing. Strength improved by 91% on the surgical leg and 69% on the non-surgical leg (Figure 2). From T2 to T3, the average maximal power output on the surgical leg improved nearly 100% from 74.3 W to 147.5 W and on the nonsurgical leg, power increased 67% from 99.5 W to 166.0 W. Prior to surgery, the subject was only able to complete 9 and 12 MFS trials on the surgical and non-surgical legs, respectively, due to knee pain and fatigue. However, at the 6 months post-operative visit, the subject was able to complete 24 MFS trials on both legs. On the surgical leg, the average ± standard deviation (SD) CV of MFS at the pre-operative and 6 months post-operative study visits was 18.03 ± 8.06% vs. 11.31 ± 4.80% (p=0.040), respectively, for concentric contractions, and 10.83 ± 4.95% vs. 4.85 ± 1.65% (p=0.007), respectively, for eccentric contractions (Figure 3). On the non-surgical leg, the average ± SD CV of MFS at the preoperative and 6 months post-operative study visits was 9.16 ± 2.46% vs. 7.79 ± 2.40%, respectively, (p=0.127) for concentric contractions, and 5.81 ± 2.03% vs. 5.31 ± 3.65%, respectively, (p=0.600) for eccentric contractions (Figure 4). 

Physical Function Physical function was assessed by the stair climbing test, gait speed, 6-minute walk test, and timed up-and-go. The stair climbing test and gait speed were assessed all four time points, T1, T2, T3 and T4, whereas 6-minute walk and timed up-and-go were assessed only at study visits T2 and T3. The stair climbing test improved from the pre-operative to 6 months post-operative (T1 to T4) study visits for stair ascent (6.71 sec vs. 5.01 sec) and stair descent (6.97 sec vs. 4.03 sec). Similarly, stair climbing test improved from 4 wks to 10 wks post-operatively (T2 to T3) for stair ascent (9.68 sec vs. 6.53 sec) and stair descent, (9.01 sec vs. 6.26 sec). Gait speed also improved from T1 to T2 to T3 (1.06 m/s vs. 1.20 m/s vs 1.36 m/s, respectively), but declined slightly from T3 to T4 (1.36 m/s vs. 1.19 m/s, respectively) (Figure 5). The 6-minute walk and timed up-and-go were evaluated at 4 wks (T2) and 10 wks (T3) post-operatively, and improved by 21% and 23%, respectively (Table 2). 

Self-Report Outcome Measures The 4-week recall of the SF-36 showed improvements in physical component summary between T1 and T2, but the mental component summary showed no improvement and actually declined slightly from T1 to T4. However, the 1-week recall results of the SF-36 showed substantial improvements from before (T2) to after (T3) MOVE, suggesting an acute response to the rehabilitation protocol (Table 3). The LEFS improved from T2 to T3 and T4 (39 vs. 62 vs. 66), but declined between study visits T1 and T2 (49 vs. 39) (Table 3). 

Discussion This case report describes a patient with OA who was a candidate for TKA based on pain, clinical examination, and radiographic findings and who participated in a novel post-operative rehabilitation approach. The purpose of this case report is to describe the early post-operative changes in muscle and physical function that were associated with a Tai Chi inspired MOVE rehabilitation program, as well as the effect of TKA surgery and this novel rehabilitation approach on a potentially important muscle function parameter, quadriceps MFS. The results demonstrated that Tai Chi inspired movements can be completed safely and feasibly without specialized equipment or licensed clinical staff direct supervision. The fact that quadriceps steadiness improved after participating in MOVE rehabilitation and in parallel with physical function and without adverse consequences provides initial evidence that this cost effective approach to early post-operative rehabilitation should be pursued in a larger trial. The potential benefits of Tai Chi inspired exercises in the present study were evident by the pre- and post-rehabilitation muscle and physical function measures. Namely, quadriceps strength, lower extremity power output, and performance on the 6-minute walk and timed up-and-go improved substantially, with clinically significant improvements occurring in gait speed and performance on the stair climbing test. The subject also improved in self-reported outcome measures, SF-36 and LEFS, at all-time points with the exception of the mental component summary, which declined at 6 months postoperative visit compared to the pre-operative measure. The clinically significant improvements in 6-minute walk observed in this study contrast somewhat with a larger study that showed only modest, but consistent, improvements in 6-minute walk following an intensive rehabilitation protocol from 2 to 4 months post-op [20]. In particular, Moffet et al. [20] showed that the effects of an intensive rehabilitation program were diminished at 8 months post-operative and therefore, suggested that more intensive rehabilitation be performed in the subacute recovery period following TKA to optimize long-term functional outcomes [20], a recommendation that is also supported by Meier et al. [7], Petterson et al. [21] and Bade et al. [1]. The Tai Chi inspired MOVE rehabilitation program performed by the subject of this case report was initiated immediately following discharge to home, which may provide some explanation for the improved results in 6-minute walk following MOVE. Nonetheless, due to the lack of a control group and long-term follow-up, it is acknowledged that the substantial improvements in 6-minute walk following the MOVE program may be anomalous. Further, the subject also described undergoing outpatient rehabilitation at an unknown facility for 4 weeks and this clearly could have influenced the muscle and mobility outcomes. She described the outpatient experience, however, as being focused on ROM exercises, stretching and modalities for pain relief. That said, it is also possible that the improvements following MOVE rehabilitation are real and widely applicable, suggesting a greater potential for sustained benefits with eccentrically-biased rehabilitation that is initiated in the early post-operative period. While both muscle and physical function improvements occurred after the MOVE program, it is noteworthy that the subject of this case report exhibited declines in some of the measures at the 4-week, postoperative time point (T2). This is not unexpected, however, as research has shown that TKA patients exhibit reduced quadriceps strength [1,22] and performance on the stair climbing test [1,23] at one month postoperatively compared to pre-operative values, but continue to improve up to 6 months post-operatively [2,7,8,22]. More specifically, Bade et al. [1], compared strength, range of motion, and function in TKA patients at 2 wks pre-operatively to healthy controls, as well as to one month and six months, post-operative measures. The results showed significant declines in all measures, including 6-minute walk and timed up-and-go, at the one-month post-operative visit compared to pre-operative values. Although at 6 months, subjects recovered to pre-operative levels on all measures except range of motion [1]. We observed a similar response in stair climbing test for the subject of this case report, wherein stair climbing test measurements declined at the 4-week post-operative visit compared to pre-operatively, but then continued to improve up to 6 months post-operatively. Results of LEFS in this case report paralleled this finding, with the result declining at T2, but improving at T3 and T4, at which time the results exceeded the pre-operative value. While we do not have strength measurements at 4 weeks post-operatively, we suspect that a similar decline in strength would have been observed at that visit. Additionally, the subject’s strength measurements indicate an overall improvement from T1 to T4 suggesting a similar trend of temporal improvement through the 6-month, post-operative time point. The second objective of this case report was to describe the effect of TKA surgery and MOVE rehabilitation on quadriceps MFS, which was assessed at the one week pre-operative visit (T1) and the 6 months post-operative visit (T4). While MFS has not been previously measured in TKA subjects either pre- or post-operatively, we believe it may have implications to physical function, such as stair ascent and descent. The MFS results for the subject of this case report showed significant improvements in the surgical leg, but not the non-surgical leg, from the pre-operative to 6 months post-operative study visits. These results suggest a positive effect of TKA surgery, as well as post-operative rehabilitation. More specifically, knee joint OA has been shown to reduce the ability to fully activate the quadriceps muscles, which leads to pronounced quadriceps weakness that can impair physical function [24]. In addition, individuals with OA exhibit impaired proprioception compared to individuals without OA, but it is not clear whether this neurologic impairment is a cause or consequence of intraarticular pathology [25]. The functional consequences of impaired proprioception may include lower gait velocity and slower stair walking time [26] both of which were observed in the subject described in this case report pre-operatively. The surgical intervention, TKA, explicitly results in the removal of damaged tissue, but also improves range of motion and reduces pain, all of which have been reported to affect proprioceptive feedback in individuals with OA [25,27]. Thus, the fact that the OA was not treated in the non-surgical leg may provide some explanation for the lack of improvement in MFS at the post-operative time points, despite consistent improvements in quadriceps strength. Again, these results may point to a greater influence of TKA surgery on this particular measure. Case studies have obvious limitations. Specifically, this case describing only a single patient lacks consistent test measures across all time points, and lacks a control for other rehabilitation protocols. To further support the claims presented herein, the MOVE program needs to be tested on a larger, more diverse patient population and compared to a control group using standard, non-eccentrically-biased rehabilitation protocols. Additionally, the rehabilitation measures should be tested over a longer duration to identify whether there is a point of diminishing returns or whether this type of rehabilitation will sustain its effects long-term. With regard to lower extremity MFS, future studies should investigate potential physical mobility measures, such as kinematics and kinetics of stair walking, that may correspond to reduced steadiness. This may offer a potential rehabilitation target to improve functional ability and potentially, reduce risk of falling, in both OA and TKA patients. In particular, while MFS has previously shown no relation with external knee adduction moments during gait, future research should focus on kinematic measures of steadiness during closed chain functional tasks such as gait and stair climbing. Finally, future research directions should concentrate on identifying rehabilitation protocols that are cost-effective and easy to perform that will sustain improved physical function post-operatively over the longterm. 

Conclusions The Tai Chi inspired MOVE rehabilitation program shows promise as an effective and safe addition to range of motion exercises in the early post-operative period following TKA. The subject exhibited clinically relevant improvements in muscle and physical function in the surgical leg, as well as improvements in quadriceps MFS. While these improvements cannot be directly attributed to this novel rehabilitation program due to the limitations noted above, the positive results suggest that this rehabilitation approach should be further explored in future trials. 

Financial Disclosure and Conflict of Interest I affirm that I have no financial affiliation (including research funding) or involvement with any commercial organization that has a direct financial interest in any matter included in this manuscript, except as disclosed in an attachment and cited in the manuscript. 

Acknowledgement N/A

 Grant Support This project was supported in-part by the: 1) NIH/NIA R01 AG031255-S1 (Paul LaStayo) and 2) NIH/NIDDK T35 HL007744 (Jerry Kaplan).

 Institutional Review Board IRB approval of the study protocol was provided by the University of Utah. 

References


























New Perspective: Outcome Measurement Indices for Yoga Therapy
Paul S Sung*
Departments of Bioengineering and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toledo, USA
Low back pain (LBP) is among the most common musculoskeletal symptoms [1]. The reported lifetime prevalence of pain and associated disability ranges from 54% to more than 80%, and the point prevalence rate is around 20% in the general population [2]. Although the burden of LBP is not clearly reported, more effective interventions including yoga therapy could potentially lead to cost savings.
Yoga therapy has been shown as an effective intervention for treating chronic or recurrent LBP [3-5]. Yoga practice may increase muscle strength, endurance, proprioception, and balance while emphasizing movement through a full range of motion (ROM) to increase flexibility and mobility [6]. For example, the rhythmic intervals of breath retention during yoga therapy could help rhythmic intervals of lumbar stability. The kinetics causing intra-abdominal pressure gradients may proceed independent of conscious, neuromuscular control [7]. However, previous studies on yoga therapy mostly utilized pain/disability questionnaires or quality of life tools to compare the limited effectiveness following the intervention [3-6].
An exercise program intended to be a regime of treatment for LBP is usually designed to improve function at the impairment level, such as pain and limited ROM, by improving muscular strength, muscular endurance, trunk flexibility, and/or cardiovascular endurance [8]. Therefore, postural control in subjects with chronic LBP might require objective measurements on complex processes involving integrated motor function for impaired balance performance [9,10].
It has been reported that subjects with LBP demonstrate aberrant motion during dynamic movements [11-14]. The co-ordination of trunk mobility during functional movements depends on flexibility and stability with optimal spinal ROM. More importantly, core muscle strengthening for spinal stability would be critical through yoga therapy. In addition, the functional approaches to treatment may provide a practical approach to the LBP problem [4,15,16].
Although wide ranges of exercise intervention have been developed and many are currently in use [3,16,17], there is conflicting evidence concerning the effectiveness of specific exercises for specific conditions. None of the available exercise interventions has emerged as the most commonly accepted treatment approach of choice for LBP. This problem may not be entirely the result of ambiguity of the effectiveness of the methods, but could be at least partially due to a lack of an outcome measure that serves as a meaningful, commonly accepted gold standard by which to compare the effectiveness of the various methods.
A recent study indicated that yoga intervention decreases functional disability, pain intensity, and depression at the 6-month follow-up in subjects with LBP [4]. Another study indicated that yoga yields an incremental cost-effectiveness intervention for treating subjects with chronic and recurrent LBP [3]. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the effect of kinematic changes in trunk stability and/or flexibility following yoga intervention.
In this regard, our motion analysis lab developed an objective tool to evaluate comprehensive postural sway during the one-leg standing test [18-21]. The measurements of relative holding time (RHT) and relative standstill time (RST) during one-leg standing might be good postural measurement tools for yoga therapy intervention. These measurements were able to determine balance performance since subjects stand on one leg with the contra lateral hip flexed 90 degrees to maintain body stability [18,20,21].
The RHT was defined as the ratio between the successful holding time and the requested holding time. The subjects were instructed to stand on one leg for 25 seconds (requested holding time); if they stood for 25 seconds (successful holding time), then the ratio was calculated as 1. Therefore, the successful holding time was indicated as the total holding time until the subject failed to maintain stability during the holding test protocol.
The RST was defined as the ratio between the sum of standstill time and successful holding time. The standstill time was measured within the threshold from the postural fluctuation on the force plate. This standstill time was the summation of the tested axis on the force plate that goes below threshold (5 degrees). Therefore, the RST represents the duration when the foot was in a static position on the force plate [18,20,21]. In this way, a comprehensive evaluation of postural balancecould be compared based on normalized kinetic indices during one leg standing following the yoga therapy.
Furthermore, it is also evident that the kinematic changes for the stability of the lumbar spine relative to the core spine could be affected in subjects with LBP who exhibit proprioceptive deficits [22,23]. In our previous studies, the core spine was the direct upward perpendicular line from the pelvic plane of the second sacrum level [18,20,21]. The pelvic plane included both sides of the anterior superior iliac spine and the second sacrum level. Therefore, the lumbar spine motion, which was affected by the pelvis and thorax, may be evaluated more accurately by three-dimensional relative motion from the core spine. Both holding time and kinematic changes from the core spine measurement would be a comprehensive objective tool since postural evaluation requires a process involving integrated motor function for impaired balance performance in subjects with LBP [18-21].
A trunk muscle imbalance may also contribute to unbalanced postural activity, which could prompt a decreased, uncoordinated bracing effect in subjects with LBP. As a result, possible kinematic rehabilitation training such as yoe prevention of falls in such subjects. Yoga is important to enhance both biomechanical and neuromuscular ga intervention could be used in thdifferences in subjects with LBP. Further investigation is required to evaluate stability and functional mobility of the spine following the intervention.
Yoga intervention has been regarded as safe with no adverse events as well as clinically significant improvements in functional disability and present pain intensity in LBP subjects compared to control subjects [4]. Therefore, the increased muscle strength, proprioception, and balance following the intervention could be objectively measured by the single leg standing test for kinetic as well as kinematic changes. It was expected that some variability exists; however, the kinematic changes suggest coordination of postural adjustability, which is the composite output of proprioceptive feedback. As a result, proprioceptive feedback training might be beneficial since postural sway has been associated with low back symptoms [24].
The LBP attributed to spinal disorders directly affects postural stability and balance deficits for detecting impairment [18]. Therefore, specific and customized exercise programs, such as yoga therapy are required for subjects with LBP for balance performance. In order to maintain postural stability components within a certain ROM during single leg standing, the body requires not only reliable sensory feedback or muscle activation from all involved joints, but also the sensitive response of proprioceptive receptors to environmental changes.
Yoga exercise intervention and outcome assessment should be integrated into functional tasks for pain reduction and flexibility in subjects with LBP. In this regard, clinicians should consider outcome measurements with single leg standing tests for postural sway which help prevent further injury by limiting an individual's response rate to external perturbations. This objective outcome measurement could be beneficial to quantify objective progress from yoga therapy for subjects with LBP.
References