Osteoarthritis of the Hip
Author:
Dr Adrian Roberts,
Medical Author, Medical
Text, Edinburgh
Validator:
Mr John F Nolan, Norfolk and Norwich
University Hospital, Norwich
Disclaimer
This synopsis has been completed by
medical practitioners. It is based on a
literature search at the
standard of a textbook of medicine
and generalist review articles. It is not intended to be a
meta- analysis of the literature on the condition specified.
Every effort has been taken to ensure that the information contained in the synopsis is accurate and
consistent with current
knowledge and practice and to do this the synopsis
has been subject
to an external validation process by
consultants in a relevant specialty nominated
by the Royal Society of Medicine.
The Ministry of Defence
accepts full responsibility for the contents of this synopsis, and for any
claims for loss, damage or injury arising from the use of this synopsis by the
Ministry of Defence.
1.
Definition
1.1 Osteoarthritis of the hip (syn: osteoarthrosis of the hip) is a common degenerative
condition, which is often associated with pain, significant disability and functional impairment.
1.2 In common with osteoarthritis affecting other
synovial joints, it is
generally believed that degenerative changes commence in the articular cartilage, as a result of either
excessive loading of a healthy
joint or relatively normal
loading of a previously disturbed joint.
Loss of cartilage leads to narrowing of the joint space and, as
progressive erosion of the cartilage
continues, the underlying bone becomes exposed.
Bone that has been thus deprived
of its protective covering of cartilage then articulates
with the opposing surface. The resultant increased
stresses lead to changes within
the bone on both sides of the joint space,
manifested by subchondral sclerosis and subchondral cyst formation, with formation of osteophytes at the joint margins.
These features provide
the characteristic X-ray appearances of hip osteoarthritis.
2. Clinical Features
2.1 Symptomatic osteoarthritis is usually defined as the presence
of joint pain or other joint discomfort along with evidence of radiographic disease.
It should be noted that many
people with radiographic disease do not have any joint symptoms and, conversely, early painful osteoarthritis may be unaccompanied by
radiographic change.1
2.2 Estimates of the extent of hip osteoarthritis in the community have varied
according to the population studied
and the precise
criteria that have been adopted
for establishing the diagnosis of osteoarthritis. The age- and sex-standardised incidence rate for
osteoarthritis of the hip has been reported
as approximately
88 cases per 100,000
person-years, a figure that is lower
than that found for osteoarthritis of the knee.
The incidence of osteoarthritis of the hip rises rapidly
after the age of 50, before declining again slightly in the eighties.2 The
prevalence of osteoarthritis of the hip is about 3-6%
in the white population, but is lower
in Asian and black populations3 and in the Chinese
population.1 Some studies have reported higher
prevalence rates in men than women, although others have reported
equivalent rates for older men and women.2
2.3 Symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip is usually insidious in onset. The most common presenting complaint is pain, initially felt in
the anterior hip, groin, or lateral
hip area. This pain is characterised as deep and aching. Referred pain may occur, felt in
the buttocks, medial thigh,
sciatic region, or knee.4 In the early stages
of the disease, pain is intermittent
and mainly associated with weight-bearing activity. As the disease progresses, pain becomes more chronic, and may also be present at rest
and during the night. The joint feels stiff, leading
to pain and difficulty in initiating movement after a
period of rest. Increasing difficulty is experienced with activities of daily living, especially strenuous prolonged
physical activity
involving standing, walking,
climbing, and squatting. With advanced disease, the range
of joint movement often
becomes limited.5 Unpredictable giving
way of the hip may occur.
2.4 Examination most often reveals
difficulty in rising
from sitting, a reduced
range of joint movement and an altered gait. Audible or palpable
joint crepitus may be noted on joint movement. The particular gait associated with osteoarthritis of the hip is known
as an antalgic gait, adopted so as to reduce pain on weight bearing. It is characterised by a shortened stance phase on the affected
side, so that the individual is observed to lean
towards the side of the painful hip and take a rapid,
quite heavy step, followed by a slower
step on the unaffected side. A cane is effective when held in the hand on the side opposite to the affected hip.
2.5 The loss of extension associated with osteoarthritis of the hip often goes unnoticed by the
patient but may lead to an increased
lumbar lordosis and give rise to low back discomfort. Loss of hip flexion/rotation is noticed because
of the resultant difficulty in putting on socks or shoes. Significant osteoarthritis
of the hip is associated with a loss of internal
rotation and an attempt
to reproduce this movement often provokes the
characteristic pain. The severely
involved hip is flexed, externally rotated and adducted. The leg is often shortened
slightly. The Trendelenburg sign may be present i.e. standing
on the involved extremity leads to a drop
in the contralateral hip due to pain or weakening of the hip abductors on the affected
side. An active
straight leg raise often reproduces the arthritic pain.
2.6 The plain x-ray is the most commonly used investigative procedure
for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the hip. Computed tomography (CT) is not often used but can be
helpful in some situations including pre-operative planning for total hip arthroplasty.
Magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) has developed into a
fairly sensitive tool for
detecting articular cartilage abnormalities of the femoral
head and acetabulum and is very
effective for visualising subchondral cysts. MRI is also useful
in the detection of
marrow-based abnormalities
and is indicated in the evaluation of possible avascular necrosis (see section
3.5.3).6
3. Aetiology
3.1 Osteoarthritis of the hip probably represents a culmination of many different
events
with a similar end result of cartilage destruction. As with osteoarthritis at other sites,
the classification recognises primary and secondary forms. Primary (or idiopathic)
osteoarthritis of the hip arises
in a seemingly intact joint, unassociated with any apparent trauma,
disease process, mechanical joint deformity or other
initiating factor. Secondary
osteoarthritis of the hip ensues
from some predisposing condition.
However, this distinction may become increasingly blurred, as many commentators
believe that most cases of primary osteoarthritis
of the hip may in fact result from unrecognised congenital or developmental defects. Moreover, where a predisposing cause exists, the risk of developing secondary osteoarthritis in the hip is greater
for
those individuals who also suffer
from primary osteoarthritis with involvement of other
joints.
3.2 Primary osteoarthritis of the hip has been linked with age, and with genetic,
hormonal, and nutritional factors:
3.2.1 Age. Primary osteoarthritis is associated with ageing,
but age alone does not cause
the condition; rather
the vulnerabilities of the joint that occur as part of ageing make the joint susceptible to disease.
3.2.2 Genetic factors. Significant generalised primary osteoarthritis is often associated with a
positive family history for osteoarthritis, probably denoting a polygenic disorder. Heritability makes a
greater contribution to osteoarthritis of the
hip and hand that it does
to osteoarthritis of the knee.1 A study of osteoarthritis of the hip in female twins
has found familial clustering
attributable to genetic
factors for joint
space narrowing. The analysis indicated a significant heritability of 64% for joint space narrowing and a heritability of
58% for osteoarthritis overall at the
hip joint.7
3.2.3 Acetabular dysplasia has also been linked with an increased
risk of osteoarthritis of the hip (see section
3.4.1). A twin study has suggested that
genetic factors account for most of the variation in acetabular anatomy at
the hip joint.7
3.2.4 Oestrogen deficiency may be a risk
factor in the development of primary
osteoarthritis of the hip in postmenopausal women, although
studies have been
inconsistent as to whether oestrogen replacement reduces this risk.1
3.2.5 Nutrition.
Preliminary data suggests
that the occurrence or progression of osteoarthritis may be increased
by nutritional deficiencies, including low-level
intake of vitamin C, vitamin E, and vitamin
D.1
3.2.6 Osteoporosis. There is a clear negative association between osteoarthritis
of
the hip and femoral neck osteoporosis. Women who have a
higher bone mineral density of the femoral bone (i.e. non-osteoporotic) have an increased
incidence of osteoarthritis of the hip.
3.3 Various congenital, developmental and acquired conditions may lead to secondary
osteoarthritis of the hip because the resultant anatomical deformity causes
loading on
an area of the joint in excess of that tolerated by normal articular cartilage and subchondral bone. The search for secondary causes
has also focused
on factors that have
the potential to generate excessive loading
on the joint.
3.4 Congenital and developmental abnormalities. Factors that affect joint shape may play an important
role in the development of osteoarthritis of the hip. Congenital and developmental abnormalities can render the hip joint misshapen, increasing local
stresses on the cartilage, and predisposing to hip osteoarthritis, often
in early adulthood. However, in many cases,
the progression to osteoarthritis of the hip may be prevented
if the predisposing deformity can be corrected before the onset
of degenerative changes.
Although these developmental abnormalities are diagnosed relatively rarely, it has
been postulated that milder forms may be more common, and may account for a
significant proportion of osteoarthritis of the hip in adults.
Three separate conditions are involved:
3.4.1 Congenital
and developmental dysplasia
of the hip. The title “developmental dysplasia (or displacement) of the hip” (DDH) is replacing “congenital dislocation of the hip” in orthopaedic parlance. DDH encompasses congenital conditions and a
wide spectrum of developmental disorders of the neonate
and infant, with a range of underlying pathology that includes acetabular dysplasia, subluxation (partial
dislocation) of the femoral head, and complete dislocation
of the femoral head from the true acetabulum. In a child
born with acetabular
dysplasia but without dislocation of the hip, the latter
may develop weeks or
months later. So-called “late”
dislocations may occur at up to 9 months or so from
birth although a
proportion of these cases actually
represent late (missed)
diagnoses. A dysplastic hip will often
continue to develop
abnormally until the
end of growth, frequently remaining completely asymptomatic.
A meta-analysis has estimated the incidence of DDH at 5 per 1000 live births. A
number of risk factors have been associated with congenital dysplasia of the hip, including female gender (up to five times more common than in boys), breech
delivery, firstborn status,
and genetic factors. The condition
is also more common in white children than in black children.8 A systematic review involving
5 cohort studies
and 4 case-control studies
has found limited evidence
for a positive association between hip dysplasia and the development of osteoarthritis
of the hip at age 50-60
or older.9 However, subluxation is invariably associated with the development of osteoarthritis, usually in the third
and fourth decades,
and an untreated high congenital hip dislocation commonly presents
with arthritic pain in the fifth and sixth decades.
3.4.2 Slipped capital
femoral epiphysis. The
head of the femur becomes posteriorly and inferiorly displaced in relation to the femoral neck due to abnormal
movement along the epiphyseal growth plate.
The condition is two to three times
more common in boys than girls, and most commonly presents during adolescence. Most cases are of unknown causation, but the condition may be associated with obesity, endocrine disorders (e.g., hypothyroidism and growth
hormone abnormalities) and renal osteodystrophy.
3.4.3 Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease. A condition of unknown cause in which
the blood supply to
the capital femoral epiphysis is interrupted, leading to avascular
necrosis. The condition presents most commonly in boys aged between 4-10
years.
3.5 Acquired
conditions associated with secondary osteoarthritis of the hip include the following:
3.5.1 Trauma. Osteoarthritis may arise following
localised trauma to the hip, One
third of patients with a dislocation or fracture-dislocation of the hip or an
acetabular fracture develop
osteoarthritis of the hip within 1 to 20 years.10 In dislocation and fracture-dislocation, a delay in
recognition and reduction
may increase the risk of developing subsequent osteoarthritis. The occurrence of avascular necrosis as a result of these injuries increases the likelihood of rapidly
progressive degenerative arthritis
in the hip and the incidence of avascular
necrosis may be increased by surgical internal fixation
of an acetabular fracture.
3.5.2 Inflammatory. Secondary osteoarthritis of the hip may develop
in a joint that has already
been damaged by inflammatory arthritis (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis),
septic arthritis, or tuberculosis of the hip.
3.5.3 Avascular necrosis of the femoral head (also known as ischaemic
necrosis or osteonecrosis) is a significant cause of hip disease. Collapse
of the subchondral bone produces a painful
synovitis, and the incongruity that is created in the hip
joint often leads to arthritis. In some instances,
avascular necrosis is associated with an identifiable cause such as oral corticosteroid therapy, Cushing’s disease, alcoholism, chronic renal failure
and renal transplantation, decompression sickness, sickle cell disease (both
sickle cell trait and sickle
cell anaemia), and the chronic non-neuropathic form of Gaucher disease. The condition may also present following a hip dislocation or femoral neck fracture and occasionally after radiotherapy to the hip region. However, in many patients with avascular
necrosis of the femoral head, no underlying cause
can be identified, and in these
patients the condition is classified as idiopathic. Many of these patients are aged
between 24 and 45 years.11
3.5.4 Paget’s disease of bone adjacent
to a joint margin is thought to be a
cause of accelerated osteoarthritis of the affected
joint.12
3.6 Most daily activities, even if performed repeatedly over many years, do not produce sufficient injury to a joint
to cause osteoarthritis, at least not if the joint is healthy.1 The investigation of factors that could potentially generate
excessive loading on the hip joint
has focused on occupational tasks, sporting/recreational
activities and obesity.
3.6.1 Occupational tasks. Studies that have set out to investigate
a link between
work tasks and osteoarthritis of the hip have produced
conflicting results,
giving rise to concerns
about methodology. In particular there has been disparity in
the criteria that have been used for diagnosing the condition and the way in which
potential confounders (such as body mass index and family history) have been
handled. In addition, measurements of exposure have tended to be very
inexact.13
A systematic
review has identified nearly 3000 references addressing the relationship between work and hip disorders. The authors considered that only
16 were of sufficient methodological
quality to warrant analysis, of which
2 were retrospective cohort studies and 14 were case-control studies.
Overall, moderate evidence was found for a
positive association between
previous
heavy physical workload and
osteoarthritis of the hip. The definition of a
“heavy physical workload” varied
between studies. In most, but not all
of the studies, a clear dose-response relationship was shown between the heaviness of the
workload and the occurrence of osteoarthritis of the hip. Moderate evidence
was also found for a
positive relationship for osteoarthritis of the hip in certain
subcategories, i.e. 10 or more years farming
or frequently lifting
heavy weights of 25 kg or over.14 The following detail from three of the studies included in this review may provide further insight into the levels of exposure involved:
• A US study, which classified work as heavy, intermediate or light, based on
responses to a questionnaire, found that
subjects who had performed heavy work for at least 15 years had 2.4 times the odds of having
osteoarthritis of the hip compared to subjects who had performed light
work.15
• A UK study
showed that men who had regularly lifted weights in excess of
50 kg for 10 years or longer had 3.2 times the odds of having osteoarthritis of the hip compared to those with low exposure. The risk increased progressively with the duration and heaviness of occupational lifting.16
• A Japanese study that included both women and men found
a significantly increased risk of osteoarthritis of the hip associated with regular (defined as more than once in an average working week) lifting
of 25 kg in the individual's first job or of 50 kg in
their main job. The average
duration of exposure was 11 years for the first job and 23 years for the main job. In
contrast, those subjects
who spent more than 2 hours each day sitting during their first job were significantly less likely
to have the disorder.17
3.6.2 Sporting/recreational activities. Once
again, conflicting evidence
may be found within the many studies that have been published, and the quality of
much of the work is open to criticism.13 The following points are of interest:
• One
large prospective study of nearly 17,000 patients
reported that a high level of physical activity (running more than 20 miles per week)
was associated with an increased incidence
of osteoarthritis in men under age 50,
but no such relationship was found for women or older men. However,
this evidence is of limited value to an investigation
into osteoarthritis of the hip, as
in its analysis of the data, the study did not differentiate between osteoarthritis of the hip and knee.18
• With
regard to sport played at
the highest level, an increased risk of
osteoarthritis of the hip has been reported
among former elite soccer players (but
not for players participating below this level)19, elite track and field athletes20 and elite level javelin
throwers and high jumpers.21 Contrasting conclusions have been reached in another study in which former
elite male endurance athletes
and track and field athletes reported
less hip disability than
control subjects.22
• A systematic
review identified nearly 3000 references addressing the influence of sporting
activities on the development of osteoarthritis of the hip; only 22 of these studies (one cohort and 21 case-control studies) met
predetermined selection criteria for methodological quality. Fourteen
studies
showed a
positive association between sporting
activities and osteoarthritis (of which 5 were statistically significant), four reported a negative relationship (none was statistically significant), and four reported
no association. Only four of the studies attempted to specify
the amount of
sporting activity involved,
and in each of these cases, a
clear dose- relationship was reported, with higher levels or frequency
of sporting activity increasing the risk of hip osteoarthritis. The review’s overall
conclusion was that there is moderate evidence for a
positive relationship between physical sporting activities and osteoarthritis of the hip. In the
subgroups that were studied,
the evidence for a link
with osteoarthritis of the
hip is moderate for running, limited for athletics, and conflicting for soccer
playing and ballet
dancing.23
3.6.3 Obesity. The
relationship between obesity and osteoarthritis
of the hip is not as
strong as that found with osteoarthritis of the knee.
Indeed, some studies have
failed to detect any link. A systematic review has found
moderate evidence
for a positive association between obesity and the development of osteoarthritis of
the hip.24
4. Prognosis
4.1 There are no interventions known to prevent disease progression in patients who are
suffering from mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the hip. Treatment programmes, aimed at relieving
pain and maintaining or improving function, comprise both pharmacological
and non-pharmacological modalities.25
4.2 Pharmacological interventions include analgesic
medications and the older-style non-
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
(NSAIDs). The known complications of NSAID treatment include a chemically induced
avascular necrosis of the bone with rapidly progressive disease, particularly in the middle-aged female. The underlying mechanism
is presumed to
be associated with the analgesic effect
of the NSAIDs, which predisposes
to microfractures of weight bearing
joints, whilst
inhibition of healing
of
these microfractures
may also play a part.26 Use of the newer
COX-2 selective inhibitors has been restricted following reports
of an increased risk of cardiovascular events (heart attack and stroke). Intra-articular local anaesthetic and steroid
injections may provide
temporary pain relief
in the irritable but early osteoarthritic hip, as well as the inflammatory arthritic hip. There is limited scientific evidence, as yet, to support
the use of the dietary supplements, glucosamine and chondroitin in early/moderate
osteoarthritis of the knee and little
or no evidence for their use in hip arthritis.
4.3 Non-pharmacological treatments for osteoarthritis that are supported by scientific
evidence comprise education, exercise, appliances (e.g. cane) and weight reduction. However, there has as yet been insufficient study to allow an evaluation of the efficacy of land-based therapeutic exercise
in people who are suffering from osteoarthritis of the
hip.5
4.4 Most cases of osteoarthritis of the hip are slowly
progressive. However, there is a subset of patients with a rapidly
progressive form of the disease, which
evolves over a few months.27 Conversely, a few patients
with hip osteoarthritis can experience clear cut
radiological and symptomatic recovery.28
4.5 Severe pain and functional limitation are the most important indications for surgery, which most commonly involves hip replacement (total hip arthroplasty - THA). THA is
very successful in the older
patient population, providing
excellent pain relief
and an improved quality of life for
patients with advanced
osteoarthritis of the hip.27
Resurfacing hip replacement is increasingly offered to the younger arthritic patient.
4.6
A variety of materials and designs
are used in the manufacture
of prosthetic joints. An
85%
success rate has been reported at 20-year follow-up of the Charnley
total hip prosthesis.4 Patients who have had one hip replacement for osteoarthritis
have a 47% likelihood of needing the other hip replaced within
10 years.29 In view of the potential
for THA components to fail over time, alternative surgical
procedures may be
considered in younger patients,
particularly those who are under 50 years of age. Pelvic or
femoral osteotomy will redistribute joint weight bearing, which may thus postpone
the need for THA. Hip arthrodesis is considered as an option
in extreme cases of severe
osteoarthritis in young individuals.
5. Summary
5.1 Osteoarthritis of the hip is a common degenerative
condition, often associated with pain, significant disability and functional impairment.
5.2 Primary osteoarthritis of the hip has been linked with age, genetic, hormonal, and nutritional factors.
5.3 Secondary osteoarthritis of the hip has been linked with anatomical deformity occurring as a consequence of certain
congenital and developmental abnormalities, trauma, joint
inflammation, and a number of other specific conditions. Factors that may generate excessive loading on the hip joint have also been extensively investigated, but often
with conflicting outcomes. Systematic reviews have found moderate evidence
linking osteoarthritis of the hip with:
• a
previous heavy physical workload (frequently lifting heavy weights
of 25 kg or over);
• physical sporting activities; and
•
obesity
5.4 Initial treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip involves pharmacological and non-
pharmacological interventions. In advanced osteoarthritis of the hip, total hip arthroplasty is
very successful in the older
patient population, providing excellent pain
relief and an improved quality of life.
6.
Related synopses
Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
7. Glossary
acetabulum
|
The cup-like hollow in the pelvis into
which fits the
head of the
thigh bone (femur). Hence: acetabular.
|
arthrodesis
|
The surgical immobilisation (fusion) of a
joint.
|
arthroplasty
|
The surgical repair
or replacement
of a joint.
|
articular
|
Of, or pertaining to, a joint.
|
avascular necrosis
|
Death of tissue
due to a depletion of blood supply.
|
cartilage
|
Connective tissue that
is more flexible and compressible than bone.
|
crepitus
|
A sensation of grating, indicating a roughened joint surface.
|
dysplasia
|
Abnormal development of organs
or cells, or an abnormal structure resulting from such growth.
|
epiphysis
|
The part of a long
bone from which bone growth
occurs. Hence:
epiphyseal.
|
Gaucher disease
|
A chronic disease of lipid metabolism caused by a congenital enzyme deficiency.
|
osteophyte
|
A bony outgrowth
or protuberance.
|
osteotomy
|
Surgical cutting of a
bone.
|
Paget’s disease
|
A condition that occurs mainly in the middle
aged and elderly and is characterised
by excessive and disorganised bone turnover
(destruction), sometimes leading
to bone pain,
fractures, and skeletal deformities.
|
polygenic
|
Relating to an inheritable characteristic that
is controlled by several genes at once.
|
prosthesis (-es)
|
An artificial substitute for a missing
body part. Hence:
prosthetic.
|
renal osteodystrophy
|
Generalised bone changes
that occur in patients with chronic renal failure.
|
sciatic region
|
The area covered by the distribution of the sciatic nerve, radiating
over the buttock and
back of thigh and down the
outside of the
lower leg.
|
sclerosis
|
Hardening.
|
subchondral
|
Beneath the cartilage.
|
14
subchondral cyst A cystic formation in the bone underlying the cartilage of a joint.
synovial joint A joint in which the opposing
bony surfaces are covered with
cartilage, there is a
joint cavity containing lubricating (synovial) fluid, and a degree
of free movement is possible.
synovitis Inflammation of the synovial membrane that lines a
synovial joint
(q.v.).
8. References
1 Felson DT. An update on the
pathogenesis and epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Radiol Clin North Am
2004;42(1):1-9, v. Review.
2 Gabriel SE. Epidemiology of the rheumatic diseases.
In: Ruddy
S,
Harris ED, Sledge CB,
editors. Kelley’s textbook of
rheumatology. 6th Ed. Philadelphia,
PA: WB Saunders; 2001. p.
321-7.
3 Hoaglund FT,
Steinbach LS. Primary osteoarthritis of the hip:
etiology and epidemiology. J Am
Acad Orthop
Surg 2001;9(5):320-7.
4 Lozada CJ, Altman RD. Management of limb joint
osteoarthritis. In: Hochberg MC,
Silman AJ, Smolen JS et al, editors. Rheumatology 3rd ed.
St Louis, MO: Mosby,
Inc;
2003. p 1853-62.
5 Fransen M, McConnell
S, Bell M. Exercise for osteoarthritis of
the
hip or knee. (Cochrane
Review) In: The
Cochrane Library, Issue
2, 2004. Chichester UK: John Wiley
& Sons Ltd.
6 Erb RE.
Current concepts
in imaging the adult hip. Clin Sports
Med 2001;20(4):661-96.
7 Manek
NJ, Cicuttini FM, Spector TD. The genetics of osteoarthritis.
In:
Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen JS
et al, editors. Rheumatology 3rd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby, Inc; 2003. p.
1817-22.
8 Beaty JH. Congenital
and developmental
anomalies of hip and pelvis. In: Canale
ST, editor. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. 10th ed. St
Louis, MO: Mosby, Inc; 2003. p. 1079-117.
9 Lievense AM,
Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhagen
AP et al. Influence of
hip dysplasia on the development of osteoarthritis
of the hip. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63(6):621-6.
10 Lequesne M, Azorin M, Lamotte J. Post-traumatic coxarthrosis. Medicolegal
conditions of the likelihood
of
fractures, luxations or contusions. Rev Rhum Ed Fr
1993;60(11):814-21.
11 Harkess JW. Arthroplasty of hip. In: Canale ST, editor. Campbell’s
operative orthopaedics. 10th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby, Inc; 2003. p. 372-96.
12 Helliwell
PS. Osteoarthritis and Paget’s disease.
Br J Rheumatol 1995;34(11):1061-3.
13 Hadler NM. Walking at work and osteoarthritis of the knee
or hip: a discussion
of the scientific literature testing associations.
Cutting edge reports [Online]. 2002 Feb 19
[cited 2004 May]. Available from:
URL:http://www.rheuma21st.com/downloads/cutting_hadler_littesting.pdf
14 Lievense AM,
Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhagen AP
et al. Influence of work on
the development
of osteoarthritis
of the hip: a systematic review. J Rheumatol 2001;28(11):2520-8.
15 Roach KE, Persky V, Miles T, Budiman-Mak E. Biomechanical
aspects of occupation and osteoarthritis
of the hip:
a case-control study. J Rheumatol
1994;21(12)2334-40.
16 Coggon D, Kellingray
S, Inskip H et al. Osteoarthritis
of the
hip and occupational lifting. Am J Epidemiol
1998;147(6):523-8.
17 Yoshimura N,
Sasaki S, Iwasaki K et al. Occupational lifting
is associated with hip osteoarthritis: a Japanese case-control study. J Rheumatol
2000;27(2):434-40.
18 Cheng Y, Macera CA, Davis DR
et al. Physical activity and
self-reported physician-diagnosed osteoarthritis:
is physical activity a risk factor? J
Clin Epidemiol
2000;53(3):315-22.
19 Roos H. Increased risk
of knee and hip arthrosis among elite athletes. Lower
level exercise and sports
seem to be "harmless". Lakartidningen 1998;95(42):4606-10.
20 Vingard
E, Sandmark H, Alfredsson L. Musculoskeletal
disorders in former athletes.
A cohort study in
114
track and field
champions. Acta Orthop
Scand 1995;66(3):289-91.
21 Schmitt H, Brocai DR, Lukoschek M. High
prevalence of hip arthrosis
in former elite javelin throwers and high jumpers: 41
athletes
examined more
than 10 years after retirement
from
competitive sports.
Acta Orthop
Scand 2004;75(1):34-9.
22 Kettunen JA, Kujala UM, Kaprio J et al. Lower-limb function among former
elite male athletes.
Am J Sports
Med 2001;29(1):2-8.
23 Lievense AM,
Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhagen AP
et al. Influence of
sporting activities on the
development
of osteoarthritis of the hip:
a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49(2):228-36.
24 Lievense AM,
Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhagen
AP et al. Influence of
obesity on the development
of osteoarthritis
of the hip: a systematic
review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002;41(10):1155-62.
25 Towheed T, Shea B, Wells G, Hochberg M. Analgesia and non-aspirin,
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs
for osteoarthritis
of the hip. (Cochrane
Review)
In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2004.
Chichester UK: John
Wiley & Sons Ltd.
26 Prathapkumar KR, Smith I, Attara
GA. Indomethacin induced avascular necrosis
of head of femur. Postgrad
Med J 2000;76(899):574-5.
27 Altman RD, Lozada CJ. Clinical features. In: Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen JS
et al,
editors. Rheumatology 3rd ed.
St Louis, MO: Mosby, Inc; 2003. p. 1793-800.
28 Dennison E,
Cooper C. Osteoarthritis: epidemiology
and classification. In:
Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen
JS et al, editors. Rheumatology 3rd ed. St
Louis, MO: Mosby, Inc; 2003. p. 1781-92.
29 Sledge CB, Ranawat
CS.
Principles of
reconstructive surgery. In: Ruddy S, Harris ED, Sledge CB, editors.
Kelley’s textbook of
rheumatology. 6th Ed. Philadelphia,
PA:
WB Saunders;
2001.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário